G37 Sedan

First Impressions: Q50 Red Sport 400 Test Drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2016, 11:34 AM
  #91  
jomama22
Registered Member
 
jomama22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 103
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Just the around view camera and nav/Bose would be enough for me. The DAS was interesting in the q50 I test drove last month. Nothing really wrong with it but at the same time there didn't feel to be any advantage or comfort in the long run. I don't think paying 20% more for most of that stuff is really worth it.
The following users liked this post:
eljoker (05-26-2016)
Old 05-19-2016, 11:39 AM
  #92  
canucklehead
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
canucklehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Coast Canada
Posts: 1,450
Received 142 Likes on 125 Posts
no questions the best value is to skip the Tech package, and the Driver Assistance Package. automakers make crazy margins on all the tech add-ons. but some people want what they want, or want everything just because they can get it. to each his own.

premium pkg is standard in Canada on the 3.0T's (as is the Driver Assistance Pkg on the RS400) so for me it is the RS400 w/out Tech (the only option on RS400). OR the 300 hp 3.0T w/Sport package (and then a tune). DAS comes with the Tech pkg up here, not a stand-alone option.

Last edited by canucklehead; 05-19-2016 at 11:45 AM.
Old 05-19-2016, 03:53 PM
  #93  
twin_snails
Premier Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
twin_snails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,067
Received 174 Likes on 114 Posts
Originally Posted by jomama22
Just the around view camera and nav/Bose would be enough for me. The DAS was interesting in the q50 I test drove last month. Nothing really wrong with it but at the same time there didn't feel to be any advantage or comfort in the long run. I don't think paying 20% more for most of that stuff is really worth it.
The thing with the new, revised DAS is that some are giving it a leg up on the standard electro-hydraulic steering. Here's one in particular that gives some pretty convincing video evidence. I think they will keep making it better over time, but for a second rev of the technology, it's pretty solid to be edging out the standard electro-hydraulic system.

Personally, if I was purchasing a Q50 (I almost did), I wouldn't want to feel anything less than how good the DAS was on that car.

Old 05-19-2016, 04:29 PM
  #94  
anestheticG
Registered User
 
anestheticG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I just came home from the dealership where I was getting my oil changed and took the Q50 red sport out for a test drive. Not much to report on any of the looks or inside if you've driven the previous Q50S with the 3.7 VQ but that new engine.... wow that thing pulls. I was only able to drive on the highway so I couldn't really evaluate the adaptive suspension, but it is definitely a very fast car. I was near 100 very quickly... brakes feel good (as they did on previous generation) I also think the 7AT shifts really fast. Using paddle shifts it upshift and downshifts very quickly.
The #s...

Car was equipped with every package Except the DAS (This is before when you could order it as a stand alone option) no illuminated kick plates and i believe nor rear spoiler. The Retail was 56,515 with a dealer discount of 1534.. They slightly low-balled the trade in value for my 2010 G37X with 888XX miles in decent condition and offered $10k. 10K plus fees and taxes give a remaining balance of 48,336.
At 60 month financing at 1.9% with zero down the payment is 863.28

I really like the car but the financially responsible side of me thinks i'm better off driving m G which i own free and clear for another year or so. I might consider getting something right before I hit 100k miles or maybe just keep driving it till 110k miles or so. I just don't want to buy a brand new car... I want to see what these go for used. FWIW that blue metallic color is gorgeous!
The following users liked this post:
twin_snails (06-13-2016)
Old 05-21-2016, 01:08 AM
  #95  
rlb
Registered Member
 
rlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 106
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So after building both a Q50 Sport AWD(300 HP) and Q50 Red Sport AWD(400 HP), basically the Red Sport costs $4000 more and the only difference is 100 HP, 0.5" wider rims, and different exhaust tips. There is no way these engines will not have tunes(piggy back, flashes) that could easily add 100 HP to the 300 HP engine. So for like $500-1000 you can have just as much HP as the Red Sport for $3000+ less. Am I missing anything?
Old 05-21-2016, 02:39 PM
  #96  
qmantran
Registered Member
 
qmantran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,138
Received 181 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by rlb
So after building both a Q50 Sport AWD(300 HP) and Q50 Red Sport AWD(400 HP), basically the Red Sport costs $4000 more and the only difference is 100 HP, 0.5" wider rims, and different exhaust tips. There is no way these engines will not have tunes(piggy back, flashes) that could easily add 100 HP to the 300 HP engine. So for like $500-1000 you can have just as much HP as the Red Sport for $3000+ less. Am I missing anything?
You'd have to wait to see. You're probably right but it's still too soon to say that confidently.
Old 05-21-2016, 05:30 PM
  #97  
ChinkyChoy
Premier Member

iTrader: (2)
 
ChinkyChoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,404
Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts
Originally Posted by rlb
So after building both a Q50 Sport AWD(300 HP) and Q50 Red Sport AWD(400 HP), basically the Red Sport costs $4000 more and the only difference is 100 HP, 0.5" wider rims, and different exhaust tips. There is no way these engines will not have tunes(piggy back, flashes) that could easily add 100 HP to the 300 HP engine. So for like $500-1000 you can have just as much HP as the Red Sport for $3000+ less. Am I missing anything?
thats not the only difference i thought some of the internals were a little different
Old 05-21-2016, 05:35 PM
  #98  
rlb
Registered Member
 
rlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 106
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChinkyChoy
thats not the only difference i thought some of the internals were a little different
Anyone know what they are? I thought I read the turbo was bigger. As for the ecu. Every ecu will be cracked at some point. Even the highly locked down ones like BMW and the GTR have been cracked. Should be less than a year.
Old 05-21-2016, 06:18 PM
  #99  
eljoker
Registered User
 
eljoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,221
Received 192 Likes on 125 Posts
2 water pumps, optical turbo sensors and different PSI.
Old 05-21-2016, 07:29 PM
  #100  
ShuuraRG
Premier Member

iTrader: (2)
 
ShuuraRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: OH
Posts: 731
Received 131 Likes on 106 Posts
This guy is maddening!

Old 05-22-2016, 02:29 PM
  #101  
da mayor
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
da mayor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,652
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by ShuuraRG
Such an amateur review
Old 05-25-2016, 06:33 PM
  #102  
eljoker
Registered User
 
eljoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,221
Received 192 Likes on 125 Posts
Stillen is live on Facebook with a Red Sport on the dyno. To the wheel on first couple pulls what's 375hp and 348lbs....
Attached Thumbnails First Impressions: Q50 Red Sport 400 Test Drive-screenshot_20160525-173047.png  
The following 3 users liked this post by eljoker:
InfinitiFreak (05-25-2016), twin_snails (06-07-2016), WillCo1 (05-25-2016)
Old 05-26-2016, 12:59 PM
  #103  
eljoker
Registered User
 
eljoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,221
Received 192 Likes on 125 Posts
From Stillen
Originally Posted by Team_STILLEN
Hey Everyone!

I know there has been a lot of speculation on the Q50 3.0tt. Well, we have one here for testing/R&D and wanted to share what we are finding. You can also follow us on Facebook and see some of our live streams.

Dyno Testing:
The Q50 Red Sport made 375 rwhp and 350 ft-lbs (consistently over 3 runs). This was bone stock, no mods.





This motor is definitely underrated. The factory claims 400hp and 350 ft-lbs as the output at the crank. Assuming 15-20% drivetrain loss (7 speed auto and runflat tires). We estimate the engine is actually making 440-470 HP and 410-440 Ft-Lbs at the crank. Keep in mind this is also on California 91 octane (the worst gas for making power).

The engine bay is very tight, but we are taking measurement to see what we can fit in there and what the potential is. We have a few ideas we are working on. As far as parts go we will being with the basic bolt ons. We will probably live stream testing of those in the future (can be seen on our facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/stillen).

***More to come***
The following 2 users liked this post by eljoker:
ANMVQ (05-26-2016), canucklehead (05-26-2016)
Old 05-26-2016, 01:31 PM
  #104  
jomama22
Registered Member
 
jomama22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 103
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
^^ Gotta keep the insurance adjusters honest. Thanks Infiniti! Lol

Have a schedule to test drive one tomorrow. Is it bad I'm planning my used car purchase in 5 years already? Lol
Old 05-26-2016, 02:25 PM
  #105  
AUR11
Registered User
 
AUR11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 726
Received 78 Likes on 61 Posts
ugh, I may have to get one in 2017. Hopefully a tune, downpipes, exhaust and some sticky tires will make for an excellent all around car. Only exterior mods I would do is paint the chrome trunk trim to match the body and vinyl wrap the window trim and grill and tint



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 PM.