G37 Sedan

Can I get a better sounding exhaust without losing low end torque?

Old 09-27-2015, 11:50 AM
  #1  
parkern
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
parkern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Murray, UT
Posts: 37
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Can I get a better sounding exhaust without losing low end torque?

Hi, I'm new to this forum, I used to have a 2008 G35X sedan and was on G35driver a lot. My G35 had K&N SRIs, Ark Grip true dual exhaust, and an Uprev tune. I just replaced it with a 2012 G37XS sedan, which is completely stock, and it feels noticeably faster than my G35. I've also driven some Q50's and they felt faster too. I'm talking specifically about acceleration from a stop. My G37 throws be back harder than my G35 did.

I don't know if this has already been answered, but I've read posts for hours and hours trying to find answers to all my questions, and this is the only one that I'm still unsure about. I don't care about making my G37 faster, I'm satisfied with that part of it, I just want it to sound more like my G35 did. Is there a way to do that without losing low end torque (and without going FI)?

Based on my research on this forum, I don't think that's possible, it seems like adding aftermarket intakes and exhaust with a tune will increase HP but will always decrease low end torque. Is that right? If that's the case, would an axle back exhaust have less of an effect on low end torque than a cat back?
Old 09-30-2015, 07:08 PM
  #2  
parkern
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
parkern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Murray, UT
Posts: 37
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Does anyone know the answer to this? If it's impossible to get a better sounding exhaust without losing low end torque, then what would be the way to do it with the least amount of torque loss? Completely guessing I'd say an axle back exhaust and then a tune would have the smallest negative effect on low end torque. And then something like a CAI, HFC, and CBE would hurt low end torque more, even though it would increase horsepower. Does that sound right?
Old 09-30-2015, 07:17 PM
  #3  
VIVID
Pyroclastic Flow

iTrader: (12)
 
VIVID's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Baltimore/Sykesville
Posts: 1,741
Received 358 Likes on 277 Posts
To be honest I didn't know that HFCs or a catback would diminish low end torque. Particularly with a tune. Can't you have one of the maps set up so you get more grunt at the bottom?

I'm interested to see because I have the CAI and will at some point (come on FI with that build ) have the HFCs, Catback and tune.

So I'm subbed for more info.

Sean
Old 09-30-2015, 07:39 PM
  #4  
parkern
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
parkern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Murray, UT
Posts: 37
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm not sure about HFCs but I've read that both intakes and exhaust will hurt low end torque, so I assume HFCs would too. I would also think that after a tune you'd get that torque back, but from what I read, even with a tune it only helps on the high end.
Old 09-30-2015, 09:51 PM
  #5  
Lego_Maniac
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Lego_Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,993
Received 505 Likes on 435 Posts
Just use more throttle. The engine revs up fast enough.
The following users liked this post:
VQ_Lag (01-04-2022)
Old 09-30-2015, 10:24 PM
  #6  
Thirty_Seven
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Thirty_Seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 629
Received 69 Likes on 59 Posts
For what it's worth, I have HFC's and a full catback (CAI too) and after my tune, I had +15 tq overall and I was up +3 tq from 2-3k RPMS.
The following users liked this post:
parkern (10-01-2015)
Old 09-30-2015, 11:23 PM
  #7  
qmantran
Registered Member
 
qmantran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,138
Received 181 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by Thirty_Seven
For what it's worth, I have HFC's and a full catback (CAI too) and after my tune, I had +15 tq overall and I was up +3 tq from 2-3k RPMS.
+3 tq?

Lol thats not enough to be considered a gain. Dyno runs can fluctuate that much between 3 runs
Old 10-01-2015, 12:52 AM
  #8  
parkern
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
parkern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Murray, UT
Posts: 37
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Thirty_Seven
For what it's worth, I have HFC's and a full catback (CAI too) and after my tune, I had +15 tq overall and I was up +3 tq from 2-3k RPMS.
Dang, that's pretty good. What CAI and exhaust do you have? Even if that's just fluctuation from one dyno run to the next, that pretty much means you at least didn't lose any torque.
Old 10-01-2015, 10:06 AM
  #9  
the_wolff
Registered Member
 
the_wolff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Temple, PA
Posts: 263
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by qmantran
+3 tq?

Lol thats not enough to be considered a gain. Dyno runs can fluctuate that much between 3 runs
I don't think he was posing it to brag about gain, just mentioning that he didn't see a loss, which was what OP was concerned about.
The following users liked this post:
VIVID (10-01-2015)
Old 10-01-2015, 12:53 PM
  #10  
ram18962
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ram18962's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 215
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
I haven't done an actual dyno on the car. But I have a Tanabe Medalion axle back exhaust, Megan Racing Y Pipe, and Fast Intentions Resonated High Flow Cats with an Uprev Tune. I feel like I definitely have not lost the torque at the low end. I don't have to push as hard from a start to get it moving and I would still be below 4k.
The following 2 users liked this post by ram18962:
GQ57s_stein (04-26-2020), parkern (10-01-2015)
Old 10-01-2015, 01:29 PM
  #11  
parkern
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
parkern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Murray, UT
Posts: 37
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ram18962
I haven't done an actual dyno on the car. But I have a Tanabe Medalion axle back exhaust, Megan Racing Y Pipe, and Fast Intentions Resonated High Flow Cats with an Uprev Tune. I feel like I definitely have not lost the torque at the low end. I don't have to push as hard from a start to get it moving and I would still be below 4k.
Well that's good to hear. I've just read so many threads saying people felt a decrease in acceleration when adding exhaust/intakes. And maybe the G37 really is just noticeably faster than the G35, but I'm just surprised that my stock G37 feels faster than my tuned G35. I also had some 19" AG wheels with 11" rear tires on the G35, so that may have hurt the acceleration a bit too.
Old 10-01-2015, 04:23 PM
  #12  
Thirty_Seven
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Thirty_Seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 629
Received 69 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by qmantran
+3 tq?

Lol thats not enough to be considered a gain. Dyno runs can fluctuate that much between 3 runs
That's between 2-3k, and an average of 3 runs pre tune and post tune. Are you not familiar with how tuning works?

Originally Posted by parkern
Dang, that's pretty good. What CAI and exhaust do you have? Even if that's just fluctuation from one dyno run to the next, that pretty much means you at least didn't lose any torque.
I have Stillen HFCs, a Motordyne cat back, and a takeda CAI, I'm tuned on uprev. And yeah at the very least I didn't lose anything. The car felt much more peppy down low after the tune too.
The following users liked this post:
parkern (10-01-2015)
Old 10-01-2015, 05:12 PM
  #13  
ScrewstonNismo
Registered User
 
ScrewstonNismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 301
Received 44 Likes on 29 Posts
I've got the full Motordyne Shockwave on my G, and if anything it felt like it added some low end grunt, as well as peak power. Next are ART Pipes, Intake Manifold, and then tune.
The following users liked this post:
parkern (10-01-2015)
Old 10-01-2015, 05:32 PM
  #14  
parkern
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
parkern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Murray, UT
Posts: 37
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'll have to check out the Motordyne. It always makes me nervous to buy a new exhaust system. Well based on your guys' experiences, it seems like I'll probably be fine getting an exhaust, and won't have to worry about low end torque.
Old 10-01-2015, 06:38 PM
  #15  
qmantran
Registered Member
 
qmantran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,138
Received 181 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by Thirty_Seven
That's between 2-3k, and an average of 3 runs pre tune and post tune. Are you not familiar with how tuning works?



I have Stillen HFCs, a Motordyne cat back, and a takeda CAI, I'm tuned on uprev. And yeah at the very least I didn't lose anything. The car felt much more peppy down low after the tune too.
Im familiar with tuning.

I wrongly assumed you were comparing your highest post tune to your lowest pre tune dynos

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Can I get a better sounding exhaust without losing low end torque?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 AM.