Engine, Intake and Exhaust Subforum dedicated to breather or engine mods (intakes, exhaust, pulleys, N/A mods etc.)

Review R2C Intake on 2013 G37 Journey Sedan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2016, 06:25 PM
  #1  
4doorfury
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
4doorfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 680
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
R2C Intake on 2013 G37 Journey Sedan

To start off, purchased this from tunerzstore who I found via the forum here. Awesome people, quick as h**l contact, fast shipping, will buy from again.

Moving on. Pretty sure this was drop shipped straight from manufacturer so at this point anything bad to say is directed toward r2c...

#1. One intake was slightly bent on the throttle body end. Fixed using small hammer. Wasn't too happy about that.

#2. The valve cover vent system on all aftermarket intakes are terrible in design from what I see. Why do none of the companies weld the bung directly under the pipe? It would be a freaking direct shot to the valve cover bungs without making stupid 90* bends with the rubber tubing...I digress here. (Should just build and sell my own for half the price)

#3. R2c's directions are kind of lacking in my book. I am extremely mechanically inclined but even reviewing these instructions left something to be desired.

#4. R2c gave me too many of certain washers and not enough of others. Please supply at least one extra locking washer to be used on the maf sensors. Just a cheap peace of mind thing. Instructions don't say to use them but every car as well as this in factory trim use locking washers. Supply them in future r2c.

Enough bad talk now. On to good.

#1. Fitment was pretty good. Adjustable bracket definitely was a good call. The air box design could be improved on but is good none the less.

#2. The black paint is fairly durable.

#3. These things sound ridiculously mean under WOT. Especially at half throttle the growl sounds v8ish with stock exhaust.

#4. Forum price is excellent. Contact tunerzstore people!

And for the finale


The following 4 users liked this post by 4doorfury:
blnewt (05-22-2016), ColumbiaSkinny (06-30-2016), ctyke (06-29-2016), SrtUltr (07-18-2016)
Old 05-22-2016, 11:09 AM
  #2  
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
blnewt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,877
Received 4,941 Likes on 4,174 Posts
Thanks for the honest review, looks like you did a great job on the install too!
Old 05-27-2016, 02:14 PM
  #3  
ZahyMatar
Registered Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ZahyMatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Franklin Park, NJ
Posts: 1,705
Received 339 Likes on 233 Posts
Still on the fence with these. I want the sound but I don't want to sacrifice any performance. Great review though.
Old 05-27-2016, 02:43 PM
  #4  
4doorfury
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
4doorfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 680
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
I am going to get a follow up dyno soon to report my unbiased gains/losses. Either way, power gain will be minimal. This is a small displacement NA motor. I did it for the sound honestly. Sounds beastly.
Old 06-29-2016, 03:38 PM
  #5  
ctyke
Registered User
 
ctyke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 51
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Have you dyno'd yet? I've got a purchase pending on these and would be interested to see results. But yeah, I'm not trying to do anything major mods so I want it for the sound that everyone seems to rave about, plus a power gain, even if it isn't very much.
Old 06-29-2016, 03:58 PM
  #6  
4doorfury
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
4doorfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 680
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Dyno is on hold pending another car being finished. We are dynoing same day. Will be in about 1-2 weeks. I have a muffler delete as well but that shouldn't really impact numbers.
Old 06-30-2016, 11:26 AM
  #7  
ColumbiaSkinny
Registered User
 
ColumbiaSkinny's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Columbia S.C.
Posts: 483
Received 74 Likes on 63 Posts
Love the black powder coat tube finish. It matches the engine bay perfectly. Nice choice...
Old 08-30-2016, 09:27 PM
  #8  
4doorfury
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
4doorfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 680
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Ok so drum roll please....










Dyno was completed...










Results are...











Same dyno, same operator, same outside temp, nearly same humidity...










Made exactly the same whp and wtq lines. I mean not kidding at all it looked like the exact same dyno. Needless to say I sold my intakes.
Old 09-01-2016, 05:45 AM
  #9  
Landshark
Registered Member
 
Landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,386
Received 187 Likes on 145 Posts
Originally Posted by 4doorfury
Made exactly the same whp and wtq lines. I mean not kidding at all it looked like the exact same dyno. Needless to say I sold my intakes.
for $125, i bought an intake for my Evo because cool noises.

for $400+ on the G37, i can live without the noises.
Old 09-01-2016, 08:28 AM
  #10  
4doorfury
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
4doorfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 680
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
The humidity that day was like 8% higher but for whatever reason the intake returned an a/f ratio around 10.5 across the run while the stockers were closer to 11.5. This tells me the stockers flow more? I am confused. COULD however mean that with tuning the r2c's could possibly outperform.
Old 09-01-2016, 04:41 PM
  #11  
SonicVQ
Registered Member
 
SonicVQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,472
Received 334 Likes on 270 Posts
This is very interesting to me...

I dynoed my car with stock intake and stock air filters and did 3 pulls. Then replaced the air filters (while on the dyno) and did more 3 pulls. With the panel K&N and it made more power across the RPM range.

The MAF placement is VERY critical to accurately report the air flow. With the K&N the mixture was slightly leaned out to around 12s, up from mid 11s.

An AFR of 10.5 is way too rich for a non-FI engine. Was that measured with their AFR sensor in the exhaust or did you data log the onboard AFR sensor?
Old 09-01-2016, 04:45 PM
  #12  
4doorfury
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
4doorfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 680
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Used a tail pipe sensor. Same sensor I used for the baseline though. Yes placement is critical but that is up to the builder not end user. There is only one way to install those sensors. I just think I bought the wrong vehicle to attempt making any decent power with. In the market for something else now.
Old 09-01-2016, 05:02 PM
  #13  
SonicVQ
Registered Member
 
SonicVQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,472
Received 334 Likes on 270 Posts
Oh, I wasn't saying that you had any say in the placement the MAF. The R2C folks hold all the cards on that one.

Keep in mind, with the AFR sensor shoved in the exhaust, they will tend to read RICHER than it is. This is due to it being placed AFTER the cat, which by design consumes oxygen, making the AFT show a slightly richer reading by about a point. Also, not all shops calibrate the AFR sensor before EVERY run.

As for mods and making more power, generally the G37 responds well to breathing mods, like intake and exhaust. My 11 G37S picked up 22 WHP and over 10 foot-lbs of torq in the midrange with K&N panel fitlers and a Stillen exhaust.
Old 09-01-2016, 06:40 PM
  #14  
4doorfury
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
4doorfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 680
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Sounds like you made out well. With r2c intakes, muffler delete, 1/8 tank gas on a 88* night with humidity at 75% at sea level I was only trapping 14 flat at 100mph. I expected better even if it was only slightly.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
si_driver
Car Care & Detailing
6
11-17-2016 01:03 PM
kevinmward
Private Classifieds
5
04-15-2016 03:09 AM
dbl07
Private Classifieds
1
04-08-2016 10:20 PM
Ron1204
Newbie Corner
8
04-04-2016 12:40 AM
w3lmatatan
Newbie Corner
7
03-23-2016 07:22 AM



Quick Reply: Review R2C Intake on 2013 G37 Journey Sedan



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM.