All About VVEL
03-26-2008, 03:55 PM
#16
From Z to G
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Atlanta
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Man, you beat me to it. I wanted to post this last weekend and didn't get around to it. Great info. It's crazy how now the valves now control all air intake. Like a throttle body would. Even though it still uses the throttle body for other small functions. This is my understanding of it. I also read that in the next couple years there going to combine this with direct fuel injection. Nice.
03-26-2008, 04:13 PM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: t.dot.O
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
someone soup-up that dc motor pls !
where's krazy J, tell him he can get crazy hp gains if he swaps out the dc motor with something bigger.
.
.
i dont really get direct fuel injection ... still.
where's krazy J, tell him he can get crazy hp gains if he swaps out the dc motor with something bigger.
.
.
i dont really get direct fuel injection ... still.
03-26-2008, 04:17 PM
#18
Registered User
i don't understand...my dealer told me the way VVEL works was that nissan implemented rabid hampsters on treadmills up on the cam area to help us power to 330hp.
my question is...there are no mention of the hampsters??
my question is...there are no mention of the hampsters??
03-26-2008, 08:01 PM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South FL
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-26-2008, 11:33 PM
#24
Interesting! Why that wasn't written by a native English speaker, I only wonder....
As for the actual technology, it looks like the valve is adjusted by a dc motor turning a screwed gear? How on earth is that fast enough to respond to a rapidly revving engine?
From the sound of that presentation, you'd think we'd be getting a 100HP+ gain over the previous engine.....
As for the actual technology, it looks like the valve is adjusted by a dc motor turning a screwed gear? How on earth is that fast enough to respond to a rapidly revving engine?
From the sound of that presentation, you'd think we'd be getting a 100HP+ gain over the previous engine.....
Not bad numbers IMO.
03-27-2008, 02:50 AM
#26
Registered User
03-27-2008, 09:46 AM
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-27-2008, 10:33 AM
#28
Registered User
that 3.2 making 333hp was in a car that sold for $50-$55K. if they want a sub-M car starting at $42K making todays standards of 300hp they needed to either bump the displacement or go FI. they chose the easiest route...platform share from a 328i and turbo...which let to amazing results.
03-27-2008, 11:22 AM
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
they chose to and they HAD to.
that 3.2 making 333hp was in a car that sold for $50-$55K. if they want a sub-M car starting at $42K making todays standards of 300hp they needed to either bump the displacement or go FI. they chose the easiest route...platform share from a 328i and turbo...which let to amazing results.
that 3.2 making 333hp was in a car that sold for $50-$55K. if they want a sub-M car starting at $42K making todays standards of 300hp they needed to either bump the displacement or go FI. they chose the easiest route...platform share from a 328i and turbo...which let to amazing results.
03-27-2008, 01:02 PM
#30
Registered User
